The Super Bowl’s Roman Numerals

Discussion in 'The Entertainment Board' started by The Huntsman, Jan 30, 2013.

  1. The Huntsman

    The Huntsman Friend of Toon Zone

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2005
    Messages:
    12,443
    Location:
    West Virginia
    Everybody loves the Super Bowl. It seems that it gets bigger and bigger each year. But not everybody likes how the game uses roman numerals. With Super Bowl L being only a few years away, and roman numerology falling out of favor as the years go on, some are suggesting that the game use regular numerical digits instead. Do you think that’s a good idea or a bad idea? Would the game be any less significant without the roman numbers?
     
  2. Shawn Hopkins

    Shawn Hopkins TZ Member of the Year 2013

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2002
    Messages:
    29,446
    Location:
    Winner's Circle
    I think doing away with them would be dumb. It's our modern gladiatorial bloodsport, the Roman Numerals just fit.
     
  3. MDawg

    MDawg Nerfariously planning

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2001
    Messages:
    15,314
    Location:
    Not of your damn business
    Plus it allows them to do stupid marketing stunts for even more payouts when it's in an entertaining pattern of some sort (Superbowl XXX anyone?)

    The Wall Street Journal did have an article about the L problem last year though.

     
  4. Aquadementia

    Aquadementia That's a lot of Mulaney!

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2004
    Messages:
    8,210
    Location:
    Bar Stool Of Solitude
    I expect them to stay traditional and stick with Roman numerals.
    L may be a special case.
    Just the one letter, and it's not an X. It may look a little off to some people. I think the L would look good wherever the number is bigger then the rest of the lettering.
    I could see them splitting the difference and using 50 on many items. 50 looks good, but if it's 49, 51, 52 I think IL, LI and LII are better.

    But then I think words with Greek or Latin roots can be fun.

    Also, you don't want any confusion with jersey numbers. I guess we'd be getting into the line men years.
     
  5. Mandouga

    Mandouga Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Messages:
    7,954
    Location:
    Newington, CT, USA
    I don't mean to nitpick, but XLIX is 49...
     
  6. Dantheman

    Dantheman Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,466
    Location:
    Michigan USA
    This kind of reminds me of that bit from The Simpsons where a teacher tells their kids why it's still important to know their Roman numerals.

    "Kids, if you don't learn your Roman numerals, you won't figure out which year a motion picture was copyrighted in."
     
  7. Peter Paltridge

    Peter Paltridge Steven Sword!

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2003
    Messages:
    35,673
    Location:
    Stars Hollow
    Gah, it should not be this hard to avoid Super Bowl ad spoilers, but those idiot companies have posted them everywhere! Don't they realize they're wasting their money if they leave no surprises?
     
  8. Aquadementia

    Aquadementia That's a lot of Mulaney!

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2004
    Messages:
    8,210
    Location:
    Bar Stool Of Solitude
    No, nothing wrong with being right.
    I bet if I was using roman numerals all the time I'd experiment with IL though. It wasn't all that long ago that I was rewriting the alphabet. I also like rearranging my keyboard layout.

    Do they even try to teach kids that?
     

Share This Page