1. We are looking for a volunteer to help out with entering the DC and Marvel comics solicitations. If you are interested, please contact Harley.
    Dismiss Notice

"Batman and Harley Quinn" Animated Release Talkback (Spoilers)

Discussion in 'The DC Comics Animation Forum' started by James Harvey, Aug 15, 2017.

?

Discuss "Batman and Harley Quinn" and leave a rating!

  1. *****

    21.4%
  2. ****1/2

    7.1%
  3. ****

    21.4%
  4. ***1/2

    14.3%
  5. ***

    14.3%
  6. **1/2

    7.1%
  7. **

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. *1/2

    7.1%
  9. *

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  10. I've Got a Batman in my Basement

    7.1%
  1. Yojimbo

    Yojimbo Yes, have some.
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2003
    Messages:
    30,436
    Likes Received:
    3,184
    There's no sex scene. It's alluded to and there's some innuendo -- part of it was seen in a trailer or clip of Harley telling Nightwing to be good and he might get a cookie.

    Long description if you want. I suppose I don't have to use spoiler tags but whatever:
    In my opinion, it was a part of farcical nature of the movie. The Superbabes serves to show how women in the genre are objectified then Harley turns the tables on Nightwing and objectifies him, then figuratively throws him away during the Batmobile drive.

    It never went as far as the Deadshot/Harley scene in Assault on Arkham for example.
     
  2. ABrown

    ABrown Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    6,194
    Likes Received:
    21
    I am still really surprised with how disappointed I was watching this last night. It wasn't even Melissa Rauch that I found disappointing, she wasn't bad. It's as if the movie was a really bad joke, and I didn't get the joke. I think it would've been better if it had all of the fat cut out, and it had just been a 30 minute New Batman Adventures episode back in the late 90's.
     
  3. Otaku-sempai

    Otaku-sempai Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,323
    Likes Received:
    364
    Some of the jokes did fall flat to me (the fart jokes in the Batmobile seemed particularly unnecessary and out of place) but that's the nature of humor. There were scenes that were certain to challenge the comfort zones of viewers; and the sequence in the dive bar might have benefited from reducing the karaoke duet by Two-Face's henchmen-twins to a background bit. Even with all that, I liked B&HQ a lot on my initial viewing. We'll see how it holds up.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. iammattie

    iammattie Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2012
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    8
    Picked up the "limited" (60,000 pieces) edition at Best Buy earlier and it came with a 96 page hardback graphic novel with work from multiple artists who had done DCAU work before (Gotham Adventures, junior novels, and Scooby Doo Team Up to name a few.) The book explores the 10 days following Harley "lighting the match" and I feel gives a more down to earth human look to the characters. There are still moments of levity (we see Alfred karaoke "No Rain" by Blind Melon as well as Two Face doing a solo duet of "Don't Go Breaking My Heart" at the henchman hideout) but Bruce reaches out to Ivy in hopes to rehabilitate her in a similar vein to how her bff is on the straight and narrow. We see Bruce put in a recommendation for Harley at her new job (not yet the tv gig). Nightwing revisits Super Babes hung up on Harley. Also a couple cool cameo scenes from Blockbuster, freeze, croc, ventriloquist, scarecrow, someone who looks like a mix between Ubu and Kyodai Ken, and a Cadmus mention. I prefer this story to the story in the movie, but obviously the pay off wouldn't have worked without the precursor.
     
  5. rggkjg1

    rggkjg1 Batman v Superman

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2002
    Messages:
    7,009
    Likes Received:
    24
    Maybe I'm exaggerating just a little, but then again I also might not be when I think it over more - This has to be the biggest disgrace to Batman in 20 years (friendly reminder - what came out exactly 20 years ago?).

    Look. I was amused and laughing when we're supposed to (Batman pointing finger to shut Harley up over and over, Catwoman henchman doing the Bat-tusi behind Batman's back). I have no problem laughing when watching a Batman thing (Batman constantly going "Hmmmm" in Justice League Dark comes to mind). What I do have a problem with is this movie resorting to fart jokes (TWICE) and a Adam West Batman parody sound effects title that says "Ow My Balls!". Am I really to believe that not one single person said "That's stupid." in response to the childish humor during the development of this project? If I suggested "You know, let's have Harley fart in the Batmobile while Batman drives." somewhere on the internet before this movie came into existence, I would overwhelmingly get "That's stupid." replies. And that's putting it very mildly. I KNOW the language would be very colorful and extreme. Or no one would even bother responding to something that could be considered "the stupidest thing I've ever heard."

    We all take and expect Batman to be DARK and SERIOUS. Maybe Batman should be "lightened up" once in awhile. Fart jokes and "Ow My Balls!" is definitely is not the way to go when "lighting up" Batman. Bruce Timm should be ashamed of himself.
     
  6. Dusty

    Dusty Superman.

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2003
    Messages:
    3,878
    Likes Received:
    40
    Thank you so much Yojimbo. I appreciate the information. I may give this a rental or something.


    Kallum.
     
  7. Yojimbo

    Yojimbo Yes, have some.
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2003
    Messages:
    30,436
    Likes Received:
    3,184
    You're welcome, Dusty.
     
  8. Otaku-sempai

    Otaku-sempai Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,323
    Likes Received:
    364
    And maybe some of us take our Batman a bit too seriously. There have been many iterations of Batman over the years, some serious, some less so, and some way over the top. Yes, some of the jokes in this fall flat(ulent) and there are some pacing issues, but that doesn't equate to a huge disgrace. The relationship estabilished between Batman and Batgirl in The Killing Joke movie was far more problematic.

    Do we? If that's the case then it's puzzling that Return of the Caped Crusaders was well-enough received to warrant a sequel, or that Batman: The Brave and the Bold was successful. I understand that much of Batman and Harley Quinn didn't work for you, some of it didn't work for me either. However, I think you put far too much emphasis on a few dicey gags. I would understand your position better if you were taking issue with the fan-service.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. SweetShop209

    SweetShop209 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2014
    Messages:
    2,037
    Likes Received:
    334
    It just occurred to me. Even if I considered this movie a DCAU production, why let it be part of Batman: The Animated Series? Why continue off from that show when Batman Beyond: Return Of The Joker already showed that Harley gave up crime? Admittedly, I haven't seen any DCAU show in awhile, but if the DCAU were to be revived, it could've continues from a plot point of Justice League Unlimited. That's why i would consider this a movie heavily inspired by the DCAU, but not in its continuity.
     
  10. iammattie

    iammattie Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2012
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    8
    But..... it did follow after JLU?

    We have reference to the watchtower, booster gold, the league, multiple other leaguers are featured as superbabes hostesses, and on top of the movie the tie in comic "Batman and Harley Quinn: Last Call" makes mention of Cadmus and the Blickbuster formula. Dwayne McDuffie and Bruce Timm have already stated ROTJ is post JLU so I'm not sure I understand why it would be a problem to fit this in between the two?

    I get that there are small inconsistencies (Hal Jordan art at Superbabes, Rhonda and Captain clown aren't destroyed, if I remember correctly it's implied Min and Max were killed, new heroes we never saw in DCAU) but at the same time we've had bigger continuity gaffs before and still count everything as canon and just come up with explanations to how it occurred (I.e. static shock seemingly taking place from 2000-2004 but the show only ages him from 14 to about 15). Everyone's take here seems to be "I didn't like it so it's not canon" and it's weird.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Yojimbo

    Yojimbo Yes, have some.
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2003
    Messages:
    30,436
    Likes Received:
    3,184
    I wouldn't consider Hal Jordan art inconsistent. Even the late Mr. McDuffie was on the record that in this canon he never became a GL and stayed a test pilot. The others you can kind of rationalize. Maybe Powergirl appeared after the JLU series finale, the Teen Titans have been implied to exist so Starfire can be rationalized, but a Granny Goodness is kinda hard -- Same with the henchman club. Randa and Clown were destroyed -- the latter could've been rebuilt I guess, Min and Max I recall that implication as well, Ubu would never hang with these people -- he's pretty stuck up and what not, Catwoman never employed henchmen in this canon, I can't really see this Ivy employing men - hasn't she only had lady henchs. Yeah, those are nitpicks but when they pile up, I'd rather say it's an AU than try to ignore them and say it's canon. I still am ok with version of this story happening like the way we know essentially how World's Collide happens thanks to Crisis on Two Earths with a few tweaks like Luthor's on book tour instead of in jail.

    It does sort of muddle the ROTJ flashback but it can said maybe the Joker pulled one last fast one on Harl and convinced her he loved her just so he could use her for the punchline he envisioned with the twisted family

    BTW, was there an explanation about ARGUS in that tie-in comic? Did they rise up in the wake of Cadmus being dismantled? Or for that matter where Batgirl and Robin are

    Sure, Static Shock aired from 2000-2004, but that doesn't necessarily mean in-universe, too. I was able to pin it from Fall 2001 to Spring 2003. Turned 14 in 2001, turned 15 in 2002, power outage story was took place in 03 before his birthday. so he was still 15.
     
  12. iammattie

    iammattie Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2012
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    8
    I'm a little bit intoxicated (last night on the town before moving across the country) so I want to apologize before hand if this post isn't formatted well or rambles or has typos.

    I understand how from person to person the nit picks can add up, but at the same time I personally try to assume everything DCAU style is canon until it absolutely can't be, so they don't bug me as much. Some things in the movie are definitely irritating for continuity (Ivy was never human? Are you going for the plant clone angle? Why are you ignoring that her plant clone died in Batman Adventures v2 then?) but at the same time my irritations lend way to creative solutions to fix said irritations so while it bugs me, I don't let it get to me too drastically. But to each their own.

    As for my point about static, we start it in late 2000 (as far as I can tell, based on homecoming season and the "y2k is so last year" comment in brother sister act) yet by the time of hoop squad, if you follow the NBA players real world careers it has to happen around feb 2004. I'm not sure if my point got lost in my wording, but I feel like that's a bigger continuity gaff than anything that happened in this movie, but we've come up with ways to rectify it (be it moving around episode placement, breaking away from real world dates, etc.)

    currently speaking, while I understand preference, I don't see anything that would 100% keep out the movie as irreconcilable non canon. Mischaracterizations aren't irredeemable in my opinion.

    That being said, on your question about the comic, no mention of ARGUS in the tie in. We get a scene six days after the movie where batman fights Blockbuster (blanking on civilian name but I wanna say that his initials were MD, matching the comic character) and apparently the reason for his transformation was Cadmus. The character and organization aren't explored much further.
     
  13. Yojimbo

    Yojimbo Yes, have some.
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2003
    Messages:
    30,436
    Likes Received:
    3,184
    Yes.

    I'd have to take a longer look at that stuff but yeah. There's a few gaffs like that here and there. That year they stated in Zeta Project.

    Oh, okay. So this comic sounds like the sequel section that's set to start in October. That seems odd of them to release them now... but yeah, Mark Desmond probably.
     
  14. iammattie

    iammattie Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2012
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    8

    Now that I go back and look at the press release I think you're right. Was thinking this was a separate thing
     
  15. SB20xx

    SB20xx Oooooh!
    Staff Member Moderator Reporter

    Joined:
    May 13, 2003
    Messages:
    40,544
    Likes Received:
    256
    I didn't mind the lighter tone to this movie. I DID mind the fart jokes, the Batman '66 action text reference (ironically, the upcoming Adam West Batman animated film looks more serious than this) and a rather gratuitous song sequence that stopped the plot dead in its tracks for a couple minutes.

    There were sequences in "The Killing Joke" that stuck with me long after I watched it. I doubt this one will have the same lasting impact with me, except of course for the stuff I didn't like.
     
    #95 SB20xx, Sep 1, 2017
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2017
  16. TylerS

    TylerS Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    2
    Can somebody send me the comic Last Call? I bought the Blu-ray but it wasn't released here.
     
  17. Bruce Wayne Jr.

    Joined:
    May 24, 2004
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was thinking the 96 page book was the same as the weekly webcomic currently running, but that's called "The Last Laugh" while the former is titled "Last Call." Dick still has the mullet in the webcomic and not in the book, so they must be different things.

    I'll have to track it down eventually because I love the DCAU, but I won't be buying the film because it's god-awful. Just a massive wasted opportunity.
     
  18. Yojimbo

    Yojimbo Yes, have some.
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2003
    Messages:
    30,436
    Likes Received:
    3,184
    Yes, the digital tie-in comic is called Harley Quinn and Batman.

    The first 5 issues is indeed "The Last Laugh". It is set before the events of the movie.

    The second half of the digital tie-in comic is 7 issues, is set to start in October, and takes place after the movie. It appears this comic that came with a version of the physical release are some if not all of this second half of comics.
     
  19. iammattie

    iammattie Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2012
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    8
    Last Call only has 4 chapters. I was wondering why the press release said Ty worked on the sequel but he didn't have a chapter in the book. Didn't realize it's gonna be a total 7 chapters. So 3 are still missing.
     
  20. Yojimbo

    Yojimbo Yes, have some.
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2003
    Messages:
    30,436
    Likes Received:
    3,184
    That could hint at the production schedule of the comic. At the time of packaging the movie and sending it out, only 9 out of the 12 chapters were done and 3 still being worked on it seems.
     

Share This Page

  • Find Toonzone on Facebook

  • Toonzone News

  • Site Updates

    Upcoming Premieres

  • Toonzone Fan Sites


Tac Anti Spam from Surrey Forum