After the preachiness of Avatar I'd stay far away from this one.
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118013500.html
Seems like Cameron is trying to replicate a Titanic-type movie.As "Avatar" continues to make box office history, James Cameron is eyeing a slice of history for a potential helming gig. The "Avatar" director has optioned Charles Pellegrino's upcoming nonfiction tome "The Last Train From Hiroshima: The Survivors Look Back" with his own personal funds. Pellegrino's book, published by Henry Holt, is set to hit bookstores Jan. 19. Advance reviews have been glowing for the title, which takes place over two days and weaves together eyewitness accounts of the Japanese civilians and American pilots who experienced the atomic explosions firsthand.
After the preachiness of Avatar I'd stay far away from this one.
Playing: DC Universe Online(PS3)
Watching: Fringe, Person of Interest, NCIS, NCIS: LA
At least 15 percent of the moviegoing audience experiences headache and eyestrain during 3-D movies. I'm one of them. And no, I don't need corrective eyewear.
Playing: DC Universe Online(PS3)
Watching: Fringe, Person of Interest, NCIS, NCIS: LA
At least 15 percent of the moviegoing audience experiences headache and eyestrain during 3-D movies. I'm one of them. And no, I don't need corrective eyewear.
Oh yeah, they're turning on Cameron. Or should I say political pundits and other such people. What I call regular people that just want to see action movies are still going to see it. There's an Illinois congressman (I think) that is saying Avatar is disrespecting America and the Marines. I would guarantee that if he did a movie that touches on Hiroshima and if it even hints that the U.S. didn't have to drop the atomic bomb, then you know people will get on his case about it.
However, there really hasn't been a movie that I can recall that ever talks about the bombings in any way. Twilight of the Cockroaches, an anime motion picture, is a really good one though.
Dynamic Soul!
That must be why James Cameron met with Tsutomu Yamaguchi, (the only recognized survivor of BOTH atomic bombings) back in late December...
Battle for Terra was a bomb and Dances With Wolves was directed by a "conservative" (back when that word didn't have the connections with the lunatic fringe that it does now), thus they didn't receive the same response that the outspokenly liberal and very successful James Cameron has gotten.
Review blog: http://rubikunsreviews.livejournal.com
As a student of Japanese culture and as an American I would go see a movie about Hiroshima, but not just because it has Cameron's name attached.
Follow my Road to Japan through my new blog!
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
"What would you do without me? ...Don't answer that."
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
POKEMON PUZZLE LEAGUE! You know you want to read my review.
This movie actually sounds pretty interesting. I've always wondered how the Japanese look back on the bombings so this really isn't a chance that I should miss.
I'm not sure if this is such a good idea at this time. Maybe he should try again later, when things are a little better.
One Piece fan. Bleach fan.
"Ive followed every part of the Bible! Even the parts that contradict the other parts" - Ned Flanders
"Say Hello... to the Bad Guy" - Razor Ramon
"They say that people mellow with age. However, the older I get, the less patience I have with cleverness." - Thomas Sowell
All I know is the Japanese aren't gonna feel too happy about this. History...o'history.
it's a story worthy of being told, but i don't trust anyone in hollywood to do it properly.
"Ive followed every part of the Bible! Even the parts that contradict the other parts" - Ned Flanders
"Say Hello... to the Bad Guy" - Razor Ramon
"They say that people mellow with age. However, the older I get, the less patience I have with cleverness." - Thomas Sowell
No, I'm pretty sure that most Japanese would want to see this film made. It's the American backlash that Hollywood should worry about.Originally Posted by ToonamiFaithful
As for myself, if I can tolerate a movie about Pearl Harbor by Michael Bay, then I can stand this...
Iwo Jima was received pretty well in Japan, and though it didn't deal directly with the bombings, I think that shows the Japanese are willing to accept a nicely done film of the war.
That said, I really really really hope the execs have the decency to not push for the 3d thing. 3d can be nice for scenery, but it is not a good idea for the worst event in Japanese history.
Follow my Road to Japan through my new blog!
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
"What would you do without me? ...Don't answer that."
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
POKEMON PUZZLE LEAGUE! You know you want to read my review.
I really think that someone like Cameron, who is confined almost exclusively to fantasy and is quite frankly clunky when taking on real world issues at best, should really keep far, far away. Cameron is at his best with aliens, robots, and secret agents. He's very good at what he does, and as we saw with Titanic, his attempts to graft his already wobbly writing skills onto something real world probably won't end well.
Preachy can work in the context of allegorical sci-fi and fantasy. In the context of a real-world film and event like this? I think that he'll irk more than a few ires.
That's true, except I simply don't trust him (or anyone in Hollywood) to deal with issues like that, especially when they have to conform to the rules of the $200 million blockbuster film. I just simply say no. Michael Bay's god-awful Pearl Harbor showed the same: stick to what you're good at, and don't try to bring politics into things, because it almost never ends well. Every now and then, I'll trust someone with it, like John Sayles' masterful Lone Star, but usually, it simply doesn't mix well with Hollywood, or filmmaking in general.
Yes, but I don't that anyone in Hollywood could do it in a way that doesn't Hollywoodize it and offend someone.
Really? Why would you think that?
Given the "rah-rah-rah America" style of every Hollywood movie, I question that...It's the American backlash that Hollywood should worry about.
I couldn't tolerate that. I think that Bay and Bruckheimer were simply way out of their league and depth, and I don't think that Cameron is any different. He's head and shoulders more intelligent than most mainstream Hollywood filmmakers, but his movie still aren't know for their intellectual and narrative complexity. Moreso than most Hollywood genre movies, I grant you, but not enough to handle something as important and real-world as this.As for myself, if I can tolerate a movie about Pearl Harbor by Michael Bay, then I can stand this...
Letters was also a lower-key drama film made a filmmaker who is known for intelligent dramas rather than special effects blockbusters. Again, I just don't know. This sounds like too risky a proposition. Not to suggest that it won't be successful financially, of course, because Cameron always seems to be able to turn lead into gold.
Not it will most likely do any good, but I encourage any interested parties to sign this petition.
"What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one."
Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death
| toonzone quick jump |
Bookmarks