Karkull
10-22-2003, 11:33 AM
I was returning home from buying the flick last night when I realized that there was something missing from this DTV. Something seemed...out of place. I compared it to the other three films, and I realized something: there was no controversy surrounding it at all. Well, arbitrarily replacing Paul Williams as the Penguin was something, but it doesn't hold a candle to the others:
Mask of the Phantasm
Originally planned to be a DTV, Warner Bros. decided that it was good enough to be released in theaters. However, they shot themselves in the foot when it came to actually doing it.
First, no ads ran for it, save for the ones on FOX during their kid's shows. Second, the film was released on Christmas Day, which is the kiss of death for any film (I can only think of one film that managed to break this curse). The film made about only a million in theaters, and was barely a blip on the radar -- Siskel and Ebert didn't even do a review.
Sub-Zero
Not as big a deal, but still mildly amusing. Made to coincide with Batman & Robin, the movie was shelved for over a year until it was released quietly after the Batman-backlash died down. I remember hearing that the WB execs did this because they were embarrassed that Sub-Zero was a much better movie.
Return of the Joker
We all still remember this one. Weeks before this film was to be released, the WB execs got cold feet over the subject matter and forced the creative team to make changes to it. It took over a year of fan backlash to get the "director's cut" released.
***
By comparison, Mystery of the Batwoman came out with no trouble at all. It almost seems strange in a way -- as if I would have appreciated it more if there was some sort of problem with its release. Go figure.
Mask of the Phantasm
Originally planned to be a DTV, Warner Bros. decided that it was good enough to be released in theaters. However, they shot themselves in the foot when it came to actually doing it.
First, no ads ran for it, save for the ones on FOX during their kid's shows. Second, the film was released on Christmas Day, which is the kiss of death for any film (I can only think of one film that managed to break this curse). The film made about only a million in theaters, and was barely a blip on the radar -- Siskel and Ebert didn't even do a review.
Sub-Zero
Not as big a deal, but still mildly amusing. Made to coincide with Batman & Robin, the movie was shelved for over a year until it was released quietly after the Batman-backlash died down. I remember hearing that the WB execs did this because they were embarrassed that Sub-Zero was a much better movie.
Return of the Joker
We all still remember this one. Weeks before this film was to be released, the WB execs got cold feet over the subject matter and forced the creative team to make changes to it. It took over a year of fan backlash to get the "director's cut" released.
***
By comparison, Mystery of the Batwoman came out with no trouble at all. It almost seems strange in a way -- as if I would have appreciated it more if there was some sort of problem with its release. Go figure.