PDA

View Full Version : New Animated Flintstones Movie



PlopKat
09-09-2001, 05:40 PM
This news is from the Fall 2001 issue of Hogan's Alley, a magazine which mostly covers comic strips & panels but also some animation.

It's a pretty short piece. Everything betweens the lines is from that article.

-------------------------------

Chris Savino is a directore on a new Flinstones animated featre from Cartoon Network. Davis Smith is co-director on the feature.

CHRIS SAVINO: The name of our feature is The Flintstones: On The Rocks, and the release date is tenatively November 2001. It's undecided if it will be a video release first or TV, but I'm pretty sure it will be TV. It changes from day to day.

DAVID SMITH: The characters are based on Ed Benedict's original designs. Anything from 1970 to present day we did not look at. Craig Kellman, our character designer, was so inspired by Ed Benedict's original work and he based his redesigns on that.

SAVINO: There were some similar designs done six or seven years ago for merchandising of the thirty-fifth anniversary of The Flintstones. The merchandising did not do too well, but at the same time those designs were never used for anything else. We thought this was a perfect opportunity to use them again and bring back the look and feel of what the Flintstones originally were. We the the original Flintstones as they appeared in Episode One in 1960 was not a kid's show, but a sitcom dealing with adult relationships and marriage. Over the years the Flintsones became very iconic. Fred was no longer a fat loudmouth. Barney was no longer a short idiot. They became very contemporary, even-tempered and unappealing. We treat our film as though 1961 has rolled around again and are taking it from there. We've neglected Pebbles and Bamm Bamm as though they didn't exist, or maybe they do exist and are grown up and have kids of their own, but it's up to you to decide. We don't touch on that at all. We focus on the problems of marraige and deal with that 1950s ere where the woman stayed at home and the man was the breadwinner. We don't reinforce that idea in any way, but we've kept Fred in that traditional role and have given Wilma more of an update, which causes them even more conflict.

SMITH: It's traditional hand-painted animation. There's no digital anything in this. We specifically wanted it to look as close as possible to the original. We had a background painter from the original series, a gentleman named Don Watson. He started around episode 113 of the original first run. It was an incredible experience to work with him. His knowledge and experience worked well with our ideas and it was a privilege to have him with us. He really brough it back to 1960 for us. The backgrounds are probably the closest thing to the original series, becuae we've really ripped them off.

SAVINO: If you look at one of the first sequences of our film, you'll see there are obviously differences from the original, but what we're going for and have said all along is, this is how you remember The Flintstones. You'll get the feeling of what it originally was. We're using Hoyt Curtin's original music, but since we'll be taking Fred and Wilma into a Latin America country, we've added some Latin American music.

SMITH: We hope we're not doing something with these characters that has been done for many, many years, which is ruin them. We could be doing it and don't know! (laughter)


SAVINO: I'd also like to pin out tht there were four people who wrote and storyboarded this: myself, Dave and a married couple, Cindy and Clay Morrow. We were all born in the '70s and are not of the 1960s era. I think it's kind of funny that we're taking an existing product like The Flintstones and bringing back the nostalgic feel, even though we were never part of that filmmaking time.

------------------------------

This magazine also features interiews with others who worked on the Flintstones: Ed Benedict, Gene Hazelton, Dale Hale, Roger Armstrong, Scott Shaw, and June Foray. Hazelton, Hale, Armstrong and Shaw also worked on the Flintstones comic strip. Foray's bit is the shortest and she mentions how disappointed she was when neither she or Daws Butler were hired for the series.

-PlopKat

BourgeoisBuffoon
09-09-2001, 06:35 PM
Well, it's animated-already it's a lot better than the live-action movies! :D

But seriously, I think this could be something good in the making. The fact they're trying to keep to the original series' chars is already a plus, as is the fact they're even keeping some original elements of production-such as the writer and the animation technique. It'll be nice to see something that's not based on flashy animation styles...

And I never knew it would be released so soon... :eek:

Rob
09-09-2001, 08:23 PM
This does sound really interesting. I hate what's happened to the characters in the past 30 or so years (I've never really been a huge Flintstones fan to begin with, really) so this might be something good.

It's GOT to be better than those awful bumpers they made with Quick Draw McGraw and Baba Louie (turned into realistic looking animals) and Pixie, Dixie, and Jinks (turned into horribly drawn "retarded" versions of their old selves). Don't know who was behind these stinkers. Why the drastic re-designs? Why couldn't they just make the cartoons with the original characters??

PorkyandDaffy
09-09-2001, 08:56 PM
Let's hope it's better than that second live-action Flinstones movie debacle.

J Lee
09-09-2001, 11:26 PM
Two things, one I hope the do and the other what I'm afraid they'll do.

1. Dump Henry Corden as the voice of Fred and use the voice action Cartoon Network has in several of their breaks (like the parking lot scene). Corden did voice work several times in the original series, but when I hear his voice, I immediately think of all the crap H-B has turned out with the characters over the last 23 years. Oh, and make sure Barney's voice is as close to Mel Blanc's as possible too -- recreating the look of the 1960-61 season won't mean much if they don't recreate the sound as well.

2. When Chis Savino says:


We've kept Fred in that traditional role and have given Wilma more of an update.

little political correctness alarm bells go off in my head, with the cynicial notion that someone at AOL Time Warner decided that Wilma will have to fit the role of a more "modern" woman, sort of like when they decided to use Tiffany for Judy Jetson's voice 10 years ago in an attempt to "modernize" that character in the Jetson's movie Universal released. The early Wilma had more of Audrey Meadows' Alice Kramden in her than the later one did; using that Wilma in the movie -- one not afraid to sass Fred right back -- would be just as workable today as it was 40 years ago.

Hope I'm wrong about item No. 2, but when the front office execs start butting in, quality usually goes right down the tubes.

Matt
09-10-2001, 09:38 AM
"Hope I'm wrong about item No. 2, but when the front office execs start butting in, quality usually goes right down the tubes."

I hope you're wrong too, but I doubt it. The characters as originally created (or re-created from their Honeymooners template) were really quite edgy. All the main characters were sharply drawn with real personalities (except possibly Betty, who I always felt was a little underwritten), including personality flaws. As the series progressed I felt much of this was lost as the characterizations were softened (particularly Fred, who could actually be quite menacing at times), and the end product became a little bland.

Not to be a cynic, but what I predict is that the project will deginerate from the best of intentions to a watered-down product (by the time the thirty five script writers and script editors start plying their craft) that could not possibly offend even the most sensitive person, and, hence, could not possibly excite anyone either. In my opinion, if you insist on zero risk, you have zero chance of producing anything worth watching.

Matt