PDA

View Full Version : Anyone getting tired of how every action sequence is "Matrix" style now?



I.R Joey
07-30-2001, 12:57 AM
I was watching Action man *Shudders* and this thing seem's so Matrix style. Forget the mentor dude who's like Morpheus I'm talking about the thing itself. The swinging camera's, the slow motion blur, it all screams Matrix. Heck even Cat's and Dogs, and Shrek are using it. When will the madness stop.

You know what's sad I haven't even seen the Matrix, and I'm getting sick of Matrix style.

Calhoun07
07-30-2001, 07:27 AM
I hated it the first time I saw it in a movie other than the Matrix. In the Matrix, there is an actual reason people move like that, and the laws of the Matrix universe are clearly laid out in the movie, and the stop motion movements make sense when you understand the laws of that universe the movie creates. When it is used outside of that movie and used so often in other movies, it gets old real quick. I feel like the stunt choreographers in those movie, and the directors too, are lazy to come up with their own origianal moves, and have to steal from the Matrix without setting up an explanation in their own movie of how people can move like that. Heck, they even did it in the Lone Gunmen, a series I actually liked, but I just hated seeing it in there. It's not funny, it's not cute, and it's just plain annoying when people steal from other movies like that.

I only tolerated it in Shrek and Cats and Dogs, since those movies are actually good. But it does need to stop, but it will probably only get worse when Matrix 2 comes out.

Frozen
07-30-2001, 09:06 AM
Case in point - "Romeo Must Die" - why on earth did they need to wire up Jet Li? For God's sake, the LAST guy on the planet who needs wires is Jet Li. The use of wires just detracted from what an awesome star and martial artist he is. Can you imagine putting Bruce Lee in wires? No. So why do it to modern martial actors?

HOWEVER... the spoof wire bit in Shreck was quite funny...

James Harvey
07-30-2001, 12:48 PM
Yeah - this little fad is getting more annoying by the movie. This partially the reason why I can't wait for RUSH HOUR 2. They producers promised there'd be no "Matrix" like effects in the movie. Just Chan doing what he does best. It is gonna be a welcome change to see real talent and professionalism, instead of wires and CGI ehahncements.

Nightflower
07-31-2001, 12:48 PM
Even the parodizing is getting old. The only times I liked it was in Shrek, cuz it was a good movie, and the Xiaoxiao stick guy flash thingies (You HAVE to see them! They're so cool!)

Ugh.......DON'T cite Action Man as an example. That's just....so bad....they use the slow motion thing every two minutes and they're TOTALLY killing it! *can't make sense*

I guess whenever there's a good thing, it raises the bar and sets a standard that everyone else is too lazy to meet so they just rip off of it.

James Harvey
07-31-2001, 01:56 PM
It was good in SHREK and CATS & DOGS but it's getting old. Even MAX STEEL is using it every second they can. It seems every CGI show is trying to rip it off. And the parodies are getting yawn-inducing. It's been 2 years...can't they come up with something better?

Joker85
07-31-2001, 02:15 PM
I thought it looked hokey and dumb in the Matrix, and even worse in other movies. Take The Mummy Returns, it could have been so much better if it hadn't had that stupid Matrix style action. And Charlies Angels was even worse!

Calhoun07
07-31-2001, 05:26 PM
Charlie's Angels was a truly bad movie, and the Matrix moves in there did not help it at all. And as far as Mummy Returns...I didn't care for that movie at all, and won't buy the DVD when it comes out.

So, for part two to this question...Will Matrix 2 have to come up with something new now that the moves they used in the first movie are so overkilled?

There should be a way to copyright things like this, or something to stop other movies from ripping it off so much.

James Harvey
07-31-2001, 09:27 PM
Maybe they'll be even slower in the sequel!!! Seriously though, enough is enough. This is why I recommend everyone to go see RUSH HOUR 2 becuase that movie is gonna be fully devoid of all this computer stuff. Pure Chan!

Mr. Eye
07-31-2001, 11:29 PM
Originally posted by DickGrayson
Maybe they'll be even slower in the sequel!!! Seriously though, enough is enough. This is why I recommend everyone to go see RUSH HOUR 2 becuase that movie is gonna be fully devoid of all this computer stuff. Pure Chan!

Yay! I love Jackie Chan. I hate it when people say his movies suck, cuz the story isn't good. That's not what Jackie Chan movies are about. I'm pretty excited about Rush Hour 2.

Mr. Eye

Mr. Eye
07-31-2001, 11:30 PM
Originally posted by I.R Joey
I was watching Action man *Shudders* and this thing seem's so Matrix style. Forget the mentor dude who's like Morpheus I'm talking about the thing itself. The swinging camera's, the slow motion blur, it all screams Matrix. Heck even Cat's and Dogs, and Shrek are using it. When will the madness stop.

You know what's sad I haven't even seen the Matrix, and I'm getting sick of Matrix style.

In SHREK's case. It's understandable. Not because it was a kick-ass movie, but because it was a spoof of the Matrix, and they pulled it off without a hitch.

Mr. Eye

joker
08-01-2001, 12:04 AM
if i was making the next 2 matrixes i wouldnt want to use these action type sequences but it would have to be in the movie because of the way the matrix works.

Calhoun07
08-01-2001, 02:23 AM
That's true, that is the way the Matrix works, so there is a valid, reasonable explanation for the movements in that movie. Which is all the more reason why the moves from that movie need to stop being copied, because too many people use them gratuiously, without explanation in their own movie or TV show of how the heck their characters can move like that. I mean, heck, will we suddenly see a fad of people crawling on walls if the Spider Man movie is successful? I could see it now...Drew Barrymore starts to crawl on the walls with no explanation in the next Charlies Angels movie (which will probably get made, I dread.) And in the name of "spoof." Yeah, right.

James Harvey
08-01-2001, 09:51 AM
CHARLIE'S ANGELS 2 is on the way, infact. 2003, likely. I think they will die down soon enough. MATRIX 2 is due next summer (I think) or the summer after so they can't spend too much more time doing all the scenes like that. Then again, the kind of camera work stuff was around before hand for those damn GAP comercials.

And RUSH HOUR 2 will rock!

Bird Boy
08-01-2001, 10:07 AM
the thing in Shrek wasn't that bad. Because it didn't totally stop. She like fidigted with her hair while it was all stopped. Still a definite reference to Matrix..but...we've been seeing references to Star Wars for over 20 years...will it ever end? probably not..

Oh..and, Charlies Angels 2? Heaven forbid!!!! The first was corny....


-BB

Nightflower
08-01-2001, 11:10 AM
YARGH! What a terrible movie excuse for pretty girls posing! The dodging bullet slow-mo was bad, but Cameron Diaz jumping in the air and kicking ten times before coming down was REALLY bad!

joker
08-01-2001, 11:53 AM
hey dg, are you looking foward to rush hour 2?

DR. BELCH
08-01-2001, 12:33 PM
--The Matrix because it was an uneven mix-mash of esistentialist philosophy (which states that things exist because you believe/percieve them to) and slick CGI that was utterly incomprehensible plotwise. There are few movies I walk out on before the credits roll; this was one of them.

Calhoun07
08-01-2001, 04:28 PM
I loved the Matrix and am looking forward to the sequel.

James Harvey
08-01-2001, 06:12 PM
Originally posted by joker
hey dg, are you looking foward to rush hour 2?

Oh yeah! I loved the first one, and got the DVD. If I can swing it, I wanna see it this weekend. And as for The Matrix Reloaded, I am THERE!

I.R Joey
08-01-2001, 06:34 PM
Charlies Angels, I think Ebert and Ropert said it right when they said this thing was just one big jiggle fest.


To tell you the truth I think Bruce Lee would be totally ticked off if someone tried to put him in this Matrix style thing. I just don't think he'd stand for it.

James Harvey
08-01-2001, 10:11 PM
There's no way Lee would stand for this, and I can understand why Jackie Chan says he doesn't want to be all "enhanced" as he calls it.

Robin2099
08-02-2001, 02:00 AM
Yes, it was cool when you see it the first time but after seeing countless spoofs of it( Charlies Angels, Scary Movie), movies where the "style" shouldn't of been used(Swordfish, Exit Wounds) and then using it to enhance an actor who doesn't even need it(Jet Li) it just becomes absurd. And always seeing slow mo action scenes is ignoring. Like everyone else said could you imagine watching Enter the Dragon like that, or The Legend of Drunken Master like that? It totally take away from the movies and how amazing Jackie and Bruce really are. Ok I'm off my tangent.

Nightwing
08-02-2001, 06:10 PM
I guess I don't mind the parodies, but the movies have DEFINITELY destroyed my last thread of patience. THE ART OF WAR is an excellent example. I saw a scene (only one scene, could I bere) where they used the slomo Matrix effects. It's just not friggin neccessary!! Cut it out will ya?

I don't mind the parodies but they have to be sure to let you know WHY they parody the Matrix effects. Cuz other movies use it too damn much! :p

James Harvey
08-02-2001, 08:36 PM
It's painful to watch when it's not needed. It make sit seem like they put that scene in the movie to make it "good" when they don't need it one single bit.

Calhoun07
08-02-2001, 09:52 PM
I had no idea all these movies used the Matrix style that you all are listing. It reminds me to stay away from them.

Mr. Eye
08-02-2001, 11:38 PM
Yeah me too. It was quite enjoyable. I refused to watch it for awhile because it starred Keany (Whoa) Reeves.lol. But I couldn't picture the movie now, with someone else....

Mr. Eye

Calhoun07
08-03-2001, 12:24 AM
I also liked Keanu Reeves in the River's Edge. That is one of the best movies ever.

The Clown Prince
08-03-2001, 03:30 AM
Hey DG, you wanted to know when Matrix 2 comes out right? Well here you go, you've got a wait ahead of you though. It's set for Christmas 2002 with Matrix 3 the following Christmas I believe or after. They are filming 2 and 3 back to back like the LOTR trilogy did. LONG friggin ***** time to wait!

The Clown Prince

The Clown Prince
08-03-2001, 03:33 AM
Actually, I've got a date for you. December 25, 2002!!!! This comes courtesy of IGN.

The Clown Prince

Calhoun07
08-03-2001, 08:10 PM
It will be a merry Christmas indeed!

James Harvey
08-04-2001, 11:36 AM
Originally posted by The ClownPrince
Hey DG, you wanted to know when Matrix 2 comes out right? Well here you go, you've got a wait ahead of you though. It's set for Christmas 2002 with Matrix 3 the following Christmas I believe or after. They are filming 2 and 3 back to back like the LOTR trilogy did. LONG friggin ***** time to wait!

The Clown Prince
Christmas 2002? Man, that is gonna be a busy and expensive time. X-MEN 2 in November 2002, and Matrix 2 in Decewmber 2002, and also LOTR2 in 2002. Wierd, three high profile sequels coming at the exact same time, almost. Speaking of X-MEN, they used the "Matrix" effects (I think) and pulled it off good. I can't really tell if they did becuase I didn't really nitce. There were a couple slow motions scnees, but nothing in the extreme of Matrix.

Thanx for the info, Clwon Prince!