PDA

View Full Version : Guaranteed To Totally Ruin "The Lion King" For Everyone!



AlgeaX
09-04-2010, 09:23 PM
Hey dudes,
Through the course of my wandering across the interwebs, I stumbled across something that casts a whole new light on Disney's 32nd animated classic.


The Lion King: A Question of Incest (http://bgms-assortment-of-works-and-thoughts.blogspot.com/2007/02/lion-king-question-of-incest.html)

I wonder sometimes if people take the time to sit and ponder the depths of a movie in a realistic sense. It can be quite surprising what one may discover. Some things may not be as obvious under first impression, despite there being a full knowledge of what is happening. Unfortunately, it is that type of thinking that can destroy a movie, or just annoy everyone else.

What comes to my interest is Disney’s The Lion King. The Lion King is, well, about lions (pretty obvious, eh?). Nearly everyone knows the story of The Lion King, about Simba and his growth and rise to become the king of the pride lands in Africa. More specifically what I find interesting focuses on Simba and his relations. Since the focus of this movie is about lions, particularly Simba, I have compared and applied real lion mannerisms on these fictitious lions.

Lions are members of the cat family, and are the only cats that live in social groups. Members of the cat family tend to live in solitude, but this can be changed under the right circumstances. These groups of lions, called a pride, basically are made up of one male lion while the rest are female lions, also called lionesses. You can say that these prides are family groups, since females tend to be related to each other, though newly matured females may set off and join other prides. Usually there is only one male, but there might be two dominate males or so, like brothers, that look over the pride. Male cubs that mature are kicked out of the pride, or sometimes fight for the position of dominate male. When there is fighting for dominance, the loser has the leave, and the winning continues or assumes the role of the dominant male. In a pride, the male will mate with all the lionesses within the pride. When a new male takes over, he kills all the cubs fathered by the previous male. This not only exterminates cubs that are not his, but also brings the females into estrus (heat) sooner. Kind of morbid isn’t it? Well this is typically what lions do.

Now, knowing this, let’s look at Simba and his situation. Simba inherits his pride from his father, the previous dominant male, and becomes the dominant male himself, and the “Lion King”. His “queen” is Nala, a childhood friend, and also a member of the same pride. We know that the male lion mates with all the lionesses in their pride. Simba’s pride was actually indeed Mufasa’s pride. Mufasa probably had, or would have, mated with all the females of his pride. Nala and Simba do not have the same mother, but knowing that they lived in the same pride, they would have had the same father, this being Mufasa. Therefore, Nala and Simba actually are half brother and half sister, if not closer. This means Simba mated with his half sister Nala, and produced their daughter Kiara; who makes an appearance at the end of The Lion King, and seen again in The Lion King 2: Simba’s Pride. And it doesn’t stop there, go back to the idea that the male lion mates with ALL of the females. In a pride, females tend to be related to each other: sisters, aunts, nieces, etc. Simba had become the dominant male lion in this particular pride. Thus, Simba will mate with all the females within his pride, including his mother. And since his mother would be related to other females in the pride Simba will basically be mating with his relatives. It seems to me that the workings of this movie, internally and externally, involve quite a bit of incest. Simba did mate with his half sister and produced a cub, and in the future will mate with his mother and his relatives when they go into heat.

My revelation seems somewhat disturbing, but this would be true according to how lions actually are. The Lion King does have some underlying incest structure to it, and it looks comparable to royalty of the past. Members of royalty would marry within their families to maintain the genealogy. This movie being cartoon and animals, it is much more subtle then if it were played out by human characters. However, this is just a kid’s movie after all, and the creators may say otherwise to my findings. Nevertheless, one can choose what they wish to believe.

"Hand picked to lead the pride" my ass, Kovu was totally Scar's kid.



EDIT: Apologies for the misspelling of "garaunteed" in the thread title, I don't know how I didn't catch that.

Lavenderpaw
09-04-2010, 11:19 PM
This is very informative.

I actually thought that this was about Lion King 4 or something.

darkdetective
09-04-2010, 11:31 PM
I realized this years ago

Dr.Pepper
09-04-2010, 11:40 PM
I realized this years ago
Yeah me too. It's what lions do in real life

Spideyzilla
09-04-2010, 11:48 PM
Yeah me too. It's what lions do in real life

Exactly, they don't think about it (the most obvious thing I have ever written) so I don't give it any thought. They're lions, not humans.

darkdetective
09-05-2010, 08:05 AM
While we're at it, Mickey and Minnie still date, so they aren't married. Yet they both have the same last name, Mouse. As such, they're either siblings or cousins of some sort. And don't tell me their name is Mouse because they're mice, because then Goofy would be Goofy Dog (as opposed to Goofy Goof) and Launchpad would be Launchpad Duck (as opposed to Launchpad McQuack) and Pete would be Peter Cat (as opposed to Peter Pete), ect. So yeah, the Mickey isn't as innocent as he looks either.

Mia
09-05-2010, 11:40 AM
We could also assume Nala's mother was a roving female, they're a bit more common than we think but they have a low survival rate. They sometimes join other prides but if they're with cub the cubs are likely to be killed, maybe Mufasa was just nice enough to let Nala live?

Or her mom was from another pride and it was a peace treaty thing.

trance2009
09-05-2010, 09:22 PM
Yeah, TvTropes mentioned this. You just don't really think about it, considering it's Disney.

Rainbow Sharpie
09-05-2010, 10:07 PM
Nala doesn't have to be a half-sister of Simba. For all we know, Scar might've been Nala's father - they both have bright green eyes. Ever notice? So that could mean Simba and Nala could be first cousins, since Mufasa and Scar are brothers. Simba and Nala may not be half-siblings.


"Hand picked to lead the pride" my ass, Kovu was totally Scar's kid.

Therefore, Kovu would be Simba's first cousin.

I say that since by your logic, Kovu would be the son of Simba's Uncle Scar and Aunt Zira - even though Simba never met Zira until Simba's Pride...

The Huntsman
09-05-2010, 10:36 PM
In the 101 Dalmatians: The Series episode “Love ‘Em And Flea ‘Em”, Lucky fell in love with his sister, Two-Tone, and the two of them went to a dance. I’m not sure how non-anthropomorphic dogs can dance, but that’s not the point. One could assume that they weren’t biologically related, as only fifteen of the pups were Pongo and Perdita’s. However, Lucky and Two-Tone were Pongo and Perdita’s own pups, which was even re-confirmed in the series finale. So that episode of a children’s animated program was all about an incestuous relationship.

Alph
09-05-2010, 11:18 PM
Eh, we humans are just a bunch of stuck-up prudes compared to the rest of the animal kingdom. That's all.

Six Year Man
09-06-2010, 10:56 AM
While we're at it, Mickey and Minnie still date, so they aren't married. Yet they both have the same last name, Mouse. As such, they're either siblings or cousins of some sort. And don't tell me their name is Mouse because they're mice, because then Goofy would be Goofy Dog (as opposed to Goofy Goof) and Launchpad would be Launchpad Duck (as opposed to Launchpad McQuack) and Pete would be Peter Cat (as opposed to Peter Pete), ect. So yeah, the Mickey isn't as innocent as he looks either.

A boatload of people have the last name Smith, are they all directly related?

moo92
09-06-2010, 12:38 PM
Dude I've know this for awhile.:shrug: Pretty crazy huh?

AlgeaX
09-06-2010, 01:54 PM
Nala doesn't have to be a half-sister of Simba. For all we know, Scar might've been Nala's father - they both have bright green eyes. Ever notice? So that could mean Simba and Nala could be first cousins, since Mufasa and Scar are brothers. Simba and Nala may not be half-siblings.

Nala as Scar's daughter? That's just messed up, I love it!


Therefore, Kovu would be Simba's first cousin.

I say that since by your logic, Kovu would be the son of Simba's Uncle Scar and Aunt Zira - even though Simba never met Zira until Simba's Pride...

Who said Simba and Zira never met before The Lion King II? They clearly recognise each other in that movie. At any rate, Kovu looks almost exactly like a young Scar and it's pretty heavily implied that Zira and Scar were mates. Yeah they keep harping on about how Kovu wasn't Scar's actual son but frankly, I think the movie doth protest too much.

Dr.Pepper
09-06-2010, 02:02 PM
Eh, we humans are just a bunch of stuck-up prudes compared to the rest of the animal kingdom. That's all.
I actually heard in anthropolgy class the reason why we have an incest taboo is because we live in family units. If we were all sleeping around with everyone in the house we would start family feuds like no other.

AlgeaX
09-06-2010, 02:05 PM
I actually heard in anthropolgy class the reason why we have an incest taboo is because we live in family units. If we were all sleeping around with everyone in the house we would start family feuds like no other.

Well that and the fact that inbreeding muddies the gene-pool something fierce, plus it's just plain icky! :p

trance2009
09-06-2010, 11:36 PM
Well, if you find your sister hot, I ain't gonna judge.







.....to your face, anyway. :o

Dudley
09-07-2010, 11:42 AM
Huh. I never gave something like this much thought (though that is kind of weird concerning 101 Dalmations), but since their animals, and ya know, CARTOONS, it doesn't really bother me.

veemonjosh
09-07-2010, 02:29 PM
While we're at it, Mickey and Minnie still date, so they aren't married. Yet they both have the same last name, Mouse. As such, they're either siblings or cousins of some sort. And don't tell me their name is Mouse because they're mice, because then Goofy would be Goofy Dog (as opposed to Goofy Goof) and Launchpad would be Launchpad Duck (as opposed to Launchpad McQuack) and Pete would be Peter Cat (as opposed to Peter Pete), ect. So yeah, the Mickey isn't as innocent as he looks either.

"Buster Bunny and Babs Bunny: No Relation."

Replace Buster with Mickey and Babs with Minnie, and you see why sharing the same last name doesn't outright make it incest.

cognitofalcon
09-07-2010, 06:50 PM
A boatload of people have the last name Smith, are they all directly related?

No, but they are distantly

I don't see the problem, they're lions. Besides when you really get down to it, every human is related to eachother, is it always incest? No,

Sparticus
09-11-2010, 01:50 AM
Oh yeah, I've known this for a while. After I saw the movie for the first time I was like "wait... but don't lions... Disney movie. Don't think too much about it." XD

Romperstoomper
09-11-2010, 09:59 AM
DAIM nature, you scary!


I never thought about this.... and it's messed up. But man, this is hilarious!