PDA

View Full Version : WSJ Article extract



laugh4me
05-04-2001, 09:38 AM
Found this extract of the WSJ June Bugs article:


The Cartoon Network had planned to run every Bugs Bunny cartoon ever produced in its “June Bugs” series, but now the company’s executives have decided that twelve episodes have racial content too inappropriate to be shown. A number of original Bugs Bunny cartoons contain racial and ethnic stereotypes of African-Americans, Native Americans, Germans and Japanese that were acceptable in the 1930s and 1940s. The Cartoon Network had considered airing the historic episodes with a caution reading, “Cartoon Network does not endorse the use of racial slurs. These vintage cartoons are presented as representative of the time in which they were created and are presented for their historical value.” But Warner Bros., the Cartoon Network’s fellow AOL Time Warner company, did not want Bugs Bunny’s image to be tarnished with racism.

For additional information refer to The Wall Street Journal or go to http://www.wsj.com.

Here's the article (http://library.northernlight.com/UU20010504150000016.html?cb=0&dx=1006&sc=0#doc)

When asked about it, here was Bugs Bunny's reaction (http://www.nonstick.com/sounds/Bugs_Bunny/ltbb_049.wav)

all41
05-04-2001, 09:44 AM
What a surprise <sarcasm>
Did anyone think the hacks at AOL Time Warner would have the courage to run all the Bugs episodes?
PC thought and behavior is Canon Law of the elite and you transgress it at your peril.
Ted Turner might not be in charge anymore but his spirit of PC censorship lives on at AOL Time Warner.

Argus Sventon
05-04-2001, 09:46 AM
:(

So BBNTN and ATARS will not be shown. I'm wondering what happened.

grundle
05-04-2001, 11:17 AM
The article talks about the 1930s and 1940s. But it should have said 1940s and 1950s. A Wild Hare came out in 1940, and the cartoons with the Bugs prototypes don't have any ethnic stereotpyes in them. And Southern Fried Rabbit was released in 1953. It seems that the author of the article didn't research his story very well.

Sogturtle
05-04-2001, 11:42 AM
Mr. Grundle is essentially right. The dates cited in the article are way off. However those erroneous dates were almost certainly supplied by the lily-livered jellyfish at Warner/CN/Turner. And as such can be see as more deliberate LIES on their part.

LONG LIVE AOL-Time-Warner the undisputed king of spineless, brainless CENSORSHIP!!!

Tim C.