Freedom Fighter
07-14-2007, 03:01 PM
We all know that no anime convention is perfect. This is true for the larger ones, especially since more attendees means more people that can complain about something. But when America's largest anime convention has an exorbitant number of problems, many which resulted in a huge backlash from the attendees at and after the con, anime fans from across the country - even those on the opposite coast like me - have to wonder... is such a disaster waiting to happen at my favorite/local convention?
The reason I'm asking this is because of this interview of Anime Expo's Marketing Consultant, Chase Wang, by Anime News Network's Zac Bertschy. Reading it myself, I can't help but wonder... shouldn't the country's biggest, as well as one of the longest-running, anime conventions have contingency plans for problems like these? Obviously, AX was subjected to a bit of bad luck too - one of their huger missteps, the SKIN concert - would've been bad news enough on it's own, and for the most part, the biggest reason behind the delay (stage set-up problems) is justifiable. But guests of honor complaining, another concert that went wrong, the initial AMV showing being scuttled because someone stole the laptop it was on (and there were no back-ups), and the biggest anime company in California conspicuously absent to begin with - obviously point to things just not going their way. But at the same time, it also suggests AX has been on a downswing for years now... possibly because the convention hasn't grown proportionately with the increase in attendance.
It's a very interesting read, and if you haven't seen it yet, the article is here: http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/interview/2007-07-13/chase-wang-on-anime-expo-2007
Despite all the problems, many beyond AX's control, it still sounds like they could've done a much better job running the con, and they should have. How much of what happened is inexcusable? Size issues aside, why are they struggling to please attendees even though they have as many coming to AX annually as the next two largest US anime cons combined (Anime Central and Otakon)? Is there anything not only AX, but the rest of the anime cons, big and small, can learn from this?
If anyone here at TZ attended AX this year, I'd especially like to hear from you, to get a better idea from the fan side of what went right and what didn't.
And on a side issue... anyone know why Viz avoided Anime Expo this year and is planning to avoid Otakon as well - all just to put all their chips at the San Diego Comic Con, which, despite a growing anime/manga market there and an even larger expected attendance than AX, is not an anime con? What does that say about the #1 manga distributor in the country and #1 in terms of number of TV anime series available on basic cable in the US?
The reason I'm asking this is because of this interview of Anime Expo's Marketing Consultant, Chase Wang, by Anime News Network's Zac Bertschy. Reading it myself, I can't help but wonder... shouldn't the country's biggest, as well as one of the longest-running, anime conventions have contingency plans for problems like these? Obviously, AX was subjected to a bit of bad luck too - one of their huger missteps, the SKIN concert - would've been bad news enough on it's own, and for the most part, the biggest reason behind the delay (stage set-up problems) is justifiable. But guests of honor complaining, another concert that went wrong, the initial AMV showing being scuttled because someone stole the laptop it was on (and there were no back-ups), and the biggest anime company in California conspicuously absent to begin with - obviously point to things just not going their way. But at the same time, it also suggests AX has been on a downswing for years now... possibly because the convention hasn't grown proportionately with the increase in attendance.
It's a very interesting read, and if you haven't seen it yet, the article is here: http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/interview/2007-07-13/chase-wang-on-anime-expo-2007
Despite all the problems, many beyond AX's control, it still sounds like they could've done a much better job running the con, and they should have. How much of what happened is inexcusable? Size issues aside, why are they struggling to please attendees even though they have as many coming to AX annually as the next two largest US anime cons combined (Anime Central and Otakon)? Is there anything not only AX, but the rest of the anime cons, big and small, can learn from this?
If anyone here at TZ attended AX this year, I'd especially like to hear from you, to get a better idea from the fan side of what went right and what didn't.
And on a side issue... anyone know why Viz avoided Anime Expo this year and is planning to avoid Otakon as well - all just to put all their chips at the San Diego Comic Con, which, despite a growing anime/manga market there and an even larger expected attendance than AX, is not an anime con? What does that say about the #1 manga distributor in the country and #1 in terms of number of TV anime series available on basic cable in the US?