PDA

View Full Version : My thoughts on Cartoon Network (WARNING: Long but open-minded)



John Pannozzi
04-23-2006, 09:17 AM
Since everyone is speculating on Cartoon Network's future, I feel I might do the same. I feel that Cartoon Network could go down one of two routes at this point.

1. Cartoon Network could finally wisen up (or the higher-ups at Turner Broadcasting could) and realize that in order to stay alive, they need to get back the people who made Cartoon Network great: people like Betty Cohen and Mike Lazzo. If those people (or at least other CN veteran executives with similar ideals) were re-given the control of the network, things would almost definitly get better (and if they didn't, then I would admit I was wrong).

Or

2. If Cartoon Network does become a live-action network, then I guess there's nothing I can do about it. I just hope if they do they change their name to "Turner Kids Network" as others have said. I mean, it would still be sad, but I guess I could live with it. I mean, lots of cable networks (like G4) seem to departing far from their original target audience, so maybe the TV industry is just in a "stupid time" (like an awkward teenager). And Cartoon Network claims their live-action programming will be different (and more original) than other stuff I won't name (http://www.cartoonbrew.com/archives/2006_04.html#001871), I guess I'll give their stuff a try. And if all else fails, then I hope there are still other outlets for Time-Warner's large animation library on television (if Adult Swim becomes its own network, then just maybe they'll show some adult-oriented classic cartoons in the daytime, and then there's Boomerang).

And you know what, even if Cartoon Network DOES die, it's not the end of the animation industry. I now feel that animation history is simply repeating itself, as animation went into a decline that arguably hit rock bottom in the '70s but had arguably been starting back in the late '40s. In the depressing era of the '70s, the industry kinda fought depression by among other things reasearching and interviewing people behind the classics. And the animation industry went into a sort of revolution (and I credit Ralph Bakshi largely but that's another story) in the late '80s and the '90s (even if bad cartoons didn't completly die out, but hey, even the golden age had some clunkers). And now, it seems this "silver age" is in the middle of going into its own decline. But, things aren't all bad (Nickelodeon and Frederaor are reviving Oh Yeah! Cartoons as Random Cartoons which I strongly feel may be a shot in the arm to the industry and Disney seems to be improving itself again), and hey, as long as there are SOME creative people out there making cartoons (even if they are underground) and taking risks, then animation will never truly die.

Well, there's my thoughts. I hope you at least read them through.

Wanted
04-23-2006, 11:05 AM
Touche.

Just to see how I feel (http://the.toonmaster.googlepages.com/aa_ttwo):

There are those people who refuse to let go of their ties to the Cartoon Network because it gave them good times in the past. It seems pretty awkward that in my second article I would lash out against certain people in the animation community, but I just don’t know what to say anymore. Completely reasonable statements don’t get through to them.That, and...
Cartoon Network isn’t exactly the best thing since sliced bread. Although it continues to offer a good amount of variety when it comes to animation, it also has its downsides, even when you take the live-action aspect out. It, like other networks, refuses to acknowledge its past. Sure, you could argue that Boomerang preserves a bit of that past, but Cartoon Network refuses to acknowledge Boomerang, to an extent. Not to mention the marathons… oh, the marathons. Ever since earlier in the new millennium, it seems like Cartoon Network’s been addicted to marathons. Has it ever come to your mind, sheep, that maybe Cartoon Network has access to the largest animation library on the globe? Daily marathons would seem out of the realm of possibility if Marc Buhaj was scheduling the network the way he should be. But, he’s not. Live with it.I don't feel for Cartoon Network. At all.

And, that warning wasn't necessary. I've seen longer posts... and more open-minded ones, at that. Sometimes, though, it helps to have a shut-minded approach. Really, who's looking to the future with the Cartoon Network when there's so much wrong with its present?

John Pannozzi
04-23-2006, 12:19 PM
Really, who's looking to the future with the Cartoon Network when there's so much wrong with its present?

Yeah, Cartoon Network is definitly in a bad time. But personally, I'm not so much upset with the programs they make (although the quality is definitly not as high as it used to be), as I'm upset with the network's schedulers. I still personally believe that smart CN vets like Lazzo could say the network (but I also still say that if my beliefs were proven wrong, I would accept it.), and he would probably put classic cartoons back on the schedule (to those classic cartoon fans who critise Adult Swim, I just wanna say that maybe classic cartoons only air occasionally on AS because perhaps of ratings and it's not necessarily the fault of the Adult Swim staff, and that if the AS staff had control of the schedule of a full network, which they very well may, we would most likely be seeing classic cartoons in the daytime).

And I think this thread should be mirrored to the general animation thread, since it the end of my original post deals with the animation industry as whole and not just Cartoon Network.

Also, I must say that I feel for Cartoon Network simply because I feel that in a way bad karma towards it (the specific reason of this karma I won't state. I won't state publicly on these boards. PM me if you want to know) helped ruin the network, and good karma (and hoping and praying and junk) just might make things better. I'll admit it sounds silly, but look at Disney's recent management changes (which I was skeptical of at first but am now starting to trust). But, to each their own.