Larry T
12-27-2001, 01:53 PM
Here's a funny anecdote regarding the process we've all come to know and hate, DVNR:
Last Saturday, as I was getting ready to travel to my sister's for Christmas, I was rewinding/setting some tapes to time-record programs I didn't want to miss when I was gone. Unfortunately for me, the channel was on NBC and in between tape viewings I caught little bits of the new "Winnie The Pooh" show.
Now, we all know that the prime objective of DVNR is to clean up dirt and dust from old, aging film prints to attempt making them look better. But there was a scene in this show where something was shaking profusely and I noticed the telltale blurring and colour wiping on the images. Later, there was a closeup on Tigger's face when he was bouncing around and I verified the DVNR wrecking the clarity.
Hmm- funny thing- ... these programs can't be that old, so whatever could make the producers think they need DVNR at all? Maybe they're just so in love with "new" technology that NOTHING IS SAFE!!! :yakko:
Last Saturday, as I was getting ready to travel to my sister's for Christmas, I was rewinding/setting some tapes to time-record programs I didn't want to miss when I was gone. Unfortunately for me, the channel was on NBC and in between tape viewings I caught little bits of the new "Winnie The Pooh" show.
Now, we all know that the prime objective of DVNR is to clean up dirt and dust from old, aging film prints to attempt making them look better. But there was a scene in this show where something was shaking profusely and I noticed the telltale blurring and colour wiping on the images. Later, there was a closeup on Tigger's face when he was bouncing around and I verified the DVNR wrecking the clarity.
Hmm- funny thing- ... these programs can't be that old, so whatever could make the producers think they need DVNR at all? Maybe they're just so in love with "new" technology that NOTHING IS SAFE!!! :yakko: