PDA

View Full Version : Disney owning Fox?


Martianinvader
06-10-2005, 01:51 AM
Disney corporate history is full of moments like this. Seemingly small pivot points that ultimately had a huge impact on the company, significantly altered Disney's destiny. Like what would have happened if -- instead of starting up Touchstone Pictures (So that Disney would then finally have a way to release adult-oriented material) -- the company had done what Ron Miller had originally wanted to do back in 1980. Which was to buy the then-hugely-financially troubled 20th Century Fox studios.

Now imagine that: Instead of just being the corporation who has "Star Tours" in its theme parks, Disney could have actually been the company that (through Fox) could have released the "Star Wars" movies to theaters, the two trilogies on videos & DVDs. What sort of impact would an aquisition like that have had on the Walt Disney Company's future?
Oh good gravy, the world would be so worse off it wouldn't be funny.


First, the subject of Star Wars....and Lucas's distribution fee deal. Which might have sat well with the Eisner of 1984, but not the Eisner of 1994 and beyond. Disney would have found a way around it, and then started producing.....STAR WARS DIRECT-TO-VIDEO MOVIES! Lucas, of course, would have no say in what went in such things...driving him to cut off all ties with Disney-Fox altogether. Disney-Fox would still own Star Wars, and instead of three Lucas-made prequels, we'd get one Star Wars film every two years, and if you can believe it, even MORE merchandising. The latest Star Wars film would have starred Raven and a digitally reduced Lindsay Lohan.


If Disney also owned Fox, it's less likely there would have ever been a Fox network. Meaning The Simpsons would have never aired. Meaning the animation revolution that followed would have never happened, meaning....among many other things, there would not be a Toonzone.net!

Chew on THAT for a while....:eek:

Natey
06-10-2005, 08:00 AM
so does this mean that if disney somehow onwed FOX today they would drastically change the schedule. That would suck, and why would their be no Toonzone.net?

~Nate~

SuperStantzio
06-10-2005, 11:49 AM
yeah I have to agree with that and I shudder to think what would happen that Disney owned the Fox Channel. That means No toozone.net. and I'm glad that didn't happen.

Hordesman
06-10-2005, 12:48 PM
If Disney owned Fox, would that mean no FoxNews? :cool:

Super Leviathan
06-10-2005, 03:39 PM
There would most likely be osme kind of anti-monopoly (or something, i'm not too keen with this matter) law or regulation that would prevent a Disney/Fox Aquisition/Merger from Happening (I think someone brought this up while the possibilities of a Disney/Time Warner merger were discussed some time ago. If you can help me out on this, please do)

Even if there were no such law, A Merger would be more possible than a flat-out aquisition, simply becuase Disney would most likely not afford to buy out Fox as a whole (And if you remembere their Fox Family Debacle, it would be wise on Disney's part to try, or vice versa)

Personally, I Would Support a Disney/Time Warner Merger, or a Disney/Viacom merger before a Disney/Fox Merger

RonDrakenfan17
06-10-2005, 03:50 PM
This means no more news and more Kim Possible lol.

Draft
06-17-2005, 04:24 PM
disney HAS onceowned fox, FOXKIDS, that is, which is why such shows as power rangers, digimon, and medabots have aired on jetix

and had dianey owned fox today.. shudddddeer, it would make me cry my eyes out of my face

Nobuyuki sama
06-17-2005, 07:21 PM
disney HAS onceowned fox, FOXKIDS, that is, which is why such shows as power rangers, digimon, and medabots have aired on jetix
FOXKids =/= 20th Century Fox.

sun
06-17-2005, 07:32 PM
Stranger things have happend, but I don't think it will ever happen. But I could be wrong. Would it be in Disney's best interest?

JDWeil
06-18-2005, 03:31 AM
Excuse me for not answering sooner. I just stopped laughing.