PDA

View Full Version : Here is something that would've been an intresting twist in the 80's.



Pokejedservo
06-02-2005, 06:01 PM
The Intellivsion while had its prime in the pre-Video Game Crash era of the 80's but survived throughout the remainder of the decade and went on until 1990. The Intellivision was made by the folks from Mattel, whom was back then a prominent toy-company most known for the He-Man toyline.

Now here is the question what if Hasbro made a console back then as well? Hasbro is most known for the Transformers and G.I Joe toylines, granted Mattel layed low on the Intellivision during the mid & later 80's when the NES ruled supreme. Though if their frequent competitior in the toy business made an arrival in the console business I'm sure Mattel would've tried a bit harder to regain their status in the game industry.

How could Hasbro have a good chance in the console industry back then? Their chances would've actually been pretty darn good in all consideration. They got Transformers, G.I Joe, JEM! and more. Not too mention they have very good relations with Japanese companies such as Takara and TOEI Animation. (In which the latter had a game-making division back then.) And they could get more, while their ways of getting good relations with Japanese companies are good nowadays they were excellent back then. Heck in actual NES history while getting TAXAN for one of the G.I Joe games wasn't thought of all that much by anyone nowadays they did get Capcom for one of the latter G.I Joe games and Konami for its Arcade game. Though its not just for Japanese companies either, they also got great support from MARVEL back in the 80's as well. (Heck they were quite involved in the productions of G.I Joe and Transformers back then.) So a potentially extensive library of MARVEL comic book based games was defintely possible.

While its most likely not enough to truly beat Nintendo. (The TMNT games for example would go to the NES unless Hasbro made some alliance with Playmates Toys which is quite unlikely for one example.) Though to be fair now against the Sega Master System on the other hand... But in all consideration they certainly had the potential to at least make a good mark on it.

Peter Paltridge
06-02-2005, 09:20 PM
It takes more than popular licensed characters to make a console a success...the games also have to be good. ET did wonders for Atari!

Cell
06-02-2005, 09:26 PM
And don't forget Total Recal, boy that was a flop. Even today movie games suck. Huh... some people never learn.

Pokejedservo
06-02-2005, 10:32 PM
There have been bad licensed games and ET was overly rushed by Atari. But there were also good ones like the Disney games from Capcom and Gremlins 2 from Sunsoft so good licensed games are certainly not an impossibility back then.

Cell
06-02-2005, 10:40 PM
Yeh I guess your right, welll there was starwars for the Intelevision. People went crazy for that game.

Nin-Nin69
06-03-2005, 03:17 AM
I still don't blame the bad games for being the reason the industry crashed in 83'. Activision made a ton of awsome games that were easily forgettable. Most of the blame towards the crash was the overflow of consoles. Yet this is going on today and people seem to care less now.

If anyone could've joined the console rush back in the 80's it was Capcom.

Chad Bonin
06-03-2005, 11:27 PM
Now, I'd really be curious if we had the Atari Entertainment System...

Pokejedservo
06-04-2005, 06:40 PM
Now, I'd really be curious if we had the Atari Entertainment System...
They defintely would've beaten Atari in the post Video Game Crash days for sure.

Chad Bonin
06-04-2005, 07:16 PM
Hasbro VS a NES-powered Atari Entertainment System?

Dunno about that.

Pokejedservo
06-04-2005, 07:29 PM
They probably wouldn't beat Early 80's Atari before the Crash but afterwards Atari wouldn't had a chance. After the crash none of their work were all that successful at all.

Though I still admit that they probably wouldn't have beaten the NES. (Though if they got the rights for US production unlike Mattel that only did that in Europe and Atari that didn't do it at all. But thats a different story altogether.)

RAINMAN
06-05-2005, 12:43 PM
You know what really would have ben a twist? If atari had agree to publish nintendo games and systems in the US when N ask them to do it.

King_of_doom
06-05-2005, 01:19 PM
i remember watching the back cover from and old comic book the game of He-man from atari.

Chad Bonin
06-05-2005, 07:13 PM
You know what really would have ben a twist? If atari had agree to publish nintendo games and systems in the US when N ask them to do it.... that's what I've been saying...

Pokejedservo
06-05-2005, 07:34 PM
I see and understand what you mean and it would've done somewhat better in game support but not quite sure.

Though here is a different one since we're going into this kind of question. What if Hasbro went with Nintendo's offer in US production unlike how Atari and Mattel did?

Chad Bonin
06-05-2005, 07:50 PM
Hasbro and Mattel were not offered the rights to produce the NES in America. Only Atari was.

Pokejedservo
06-05-2005, 08:35 PM
Hasbro and Mattel were not offered the rights to produce the NES in America. Only Atari was.
I knew that about Hasbro but Mattel wasn't offered? Thats kinda surprising considering that did do that in Europe IIRC.

Pokejedservo
06-06-2005, 04:30 PM
In 1998, Hasbro ended buying Atari, makes you wonder what would've happened if it occured earlier huh?