PDA

View Full Version : Say goodbye to the bootleg man...



MJC
06-26-2004, 08:41 PM
Congress Looks Out for Hollywood
By Katie Dean

Story location: http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,64005,00.html

02:00 AM Jun. 26, 2004 PT

Congress advanced or passed several bills this week that would increase penalties for infringing copyright, and outlaw devices and software that could be used to illegally copy and distribute content. The legislation would also protect computer users from identity theft and the spread of spyware.

The Senate introduced the Induce Act, which critics say would ban file-sharing networks and stymie the introduction of any technology that could be used to copy and distribute copyright work. In addition, the Senate passed the Pirate Act, which would make it easier for the feds to go after file swappers. And on Friday, it passed a bill that would throw anyone caught videotaping a movie in theater into prison for up to three to 10 years.


In the House of Representatives, a committee approved a bill that would ban the use of spyware to track computer users without their permission.

Technologists and copyright activists were most alarmed by the Induce Act, backed by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), who in the past five years has received $158,000 in campaign contributions from the television, movie and music industries, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Critics say the bills would make computer and electronic companies think twice before introducing any device that could conceivably distribute copyright works. Even existing devices and software -- like iPods and FTP servers -- could run afoul of the law.

"The reality of this is that you're going to have a world where Hollywood controls technology," said Jason Schultz, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "If you don't get Hollywood's approval, no one will fund your project out of fear of the lawsuits."

The bill (PDF), officially titled the Inducing Infringement of Copyrights Act and co-sponsored by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), would "allow creative artists to sue corporations that profit by encouraging children, teenagers and others to commit illegal or criminal acts of copyright infringement," according to a press release from Hatch's office.

"Senators Hatch and Leahy, and a distinguished group of supporters, have crafted narrowly focused but meaningful legislation," said Mitch Bainwol, chief executive of the Recording Industry Association of America. "This bill places the spotlight squarely on the bad actors who have hijacked a promising technology for illicit means and ignoble profits."

Schultz said the bill is so broad it would squash rights and legal precedents that allow people to own copying devices, even if they could be used for illegal purposes.

But the technology industry and Hollywood likely will fight a big battle, and it's not certain the bill will find enough backing to become law, analysts said.

Here's a rundown of the other bills passed or advanced this week.

ART Act: The Senate unanimously passed the Artists' Rights and Theft Prevention Act, which would penalize those who surreptitiously record movies in a movie theater with up to 10 years in prison. The bill -- introduced by Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-California) and John Cornyn (R-Texas) -- also increases penalties for those who illegally distribute films or music before they are released.

"Today, high-quality, yet illegal, copies of copyrighted material can be and are distributed easily -- and almost instantly -- via e-mail, peer-to-peer networks and other means to millions of users on a regular basis," Cornyn said in a statement. "We are now one step closer to making thefts far more difficult, prosecution of criminals much easier, and the protection of consumers and artists much stronger."

A similar bill was approved by a subcommittee in the House of Representatives in March.

"This is an overreaction to something that's an internal problem for the Motion Picture Association," Schultz said. "If their own employees are leaking films onto the Internet, then they should clean up their own house."

- - -

Pirate Act: This legislation would make it easier for the Justice Department to crack down on file swappers.

Introduced by Hatch and Leahy, the Pirate Act (officially called the Protecting Intellectual Rights Against Theft and Expropriation Act) amends copyright law to allow the attorney general to file civil lawsuits against people accused of file trading. Currently, the government can only file criminal infringement cases, which require a higher burden of proof than civil cases.

The Recording Industry Association of America, which represents the five major music labels, applauded the bill.

Critics said the law would make taxpayers foot the bill for corporate interests' legal woes.

"You've got multibillion-dollar corporate industries who have shown that they can easily sue file sharers and infringers personally," said the EFF's Schultz. "With national security concerns at an all-time high, I would be concerned about distracting federal law enforcement and diverting their efforts into this area."

- - -

Identity Theft Act: On Friday, the Senate unanimously passed the Identity Theft Penalty Enhancement Act, which doles out harsher penalties for identity thieves.

The House passed the bill on Wednesday, which means the legislation will very likely become law.

- - -

Spy Act: On Thursday, a congressional committee approved a bill that would require software makers to notify users before installing spyware -- programs that monitor a person's behavior online.

HR2929, called the Securely Protect Yourself Against Cyber Trespass Act, or Spy Act, would also impose millions in fines on those who steal users' identities or log keystrokes, and mandates that spyware be easy to remove.

"I feel that we have fashioned a bill that is strong enough to protect consumers from spyware-related privacy invasions without impeding the growth of technology," said Rep. Mary Bono (R-California), co-sponsor of the bill

-----------------------------------------------------------


WTF?! What's next, felonious jaywalking? :rolleyes:

True Noir
06-26-2004, 09:20 PM
Good thing this is only in America right? When I went to Asia, I saw the movie Cats and Dogs before it even aired in theaters here is the US.

RZetlin
06-26-2004, 10:20 PM
These bills will pretty much outlaw P2P.

And "fair use" is in great danger.

This is just nuts.

BTW, when is the election for the sentors?

ZumbidoMetal
06-26-2004, 10:45 PM
Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), who in the past five years has received $158,000 in campaign contributions from the television, movie and music industries.


I wonder how these bills get passed? :rolleyes:


Critics said the law would make taxpayers foot the bill for corporate interests' legal woes.

How Nice.

Classic Speedy
06-26-2004, 11:17 PM
"This is an overreaction to something that's an internal problem for the Motion Picture Association," Schultz said. "If their own employees are leaking films onto the Internet, then they should clean up their own house." I agree. Though movie piracy is still a problem (heck, I saw DVD copies of Elf for sale on the streets of NYC in December), if a movie is available on P2P networks weeks before a release, you have to wonder if non-movie industry people are REALLY at fault. :shrug:

Juu-kuchi
06-26-2004, 11:42 PM
Wow...

Why does Congress concern itself with Hollywood like this? I just find this annoying that they consider this a major issue.

RogueMartian
06-27-2004, 04:21 AM
Don't lose any sleep over it. All the file sharing that goes on, the government doesn't really care, this is all just lipservice to the corporations that pay for their re-election campaigns. Secondly, like it's gonna stop anything, for every p2p they shut down, there's 50 others :rolleyes: when are they gonna learn to change their business model. Sheesh.

Tapout
06-27-2004, 04:27 AM
God forbid people should have to pay for anything.

Juu-kuchi
06-27-2004, 11:24 AM
Don't lose any sleep over it.
I actually slept well last night.

I was just rather annoyed at this.

Frank Castle
06-27-2004, 11:25 AM
God forbid people should have to pay for anything.Well it comes down to a person's morals. I bet if you ask every American if they had a choice between paying for something and getting something for free even though it's illegal but nobody except studio executives and cranky senators care, most if not all people would download.

Mynd Hed
06-27-2004, 11:49 AM
Eh, I wouldn't worry. In the unlikely event that this passes into law, it'll no doubt get killed by the judicial system (after a long annoying trial, of course) when/if it actually came to court. Love those checks and balances!

EinBebop
06-27-2004, 01:04 PM
ART Act: The Senate unanimously passed the Artists' Rights and Theft Prevention Act, which would penalize those who surreptitiously record movies in a movie theater with up to 10 years in prison. I'm not quite sure the punishment fits the crime here... unless our principal of justice is now "The more powerful the accuser, the more swift and blinding be the fury."

shogunthethird
06-27-2004, 10:00 PM
yes I'm sure they'll be able to stop the illegal production of bootleg copies, just like how they're able to stop the flow of illegal drugs now and they were able to stop the illegal alcohol trade during prohibition

Reed Richards
06-27-2004, 10:06 PM
that if the industry would release films to DVD quicker, most of the bootleg possessors wouldn't purchase them any longer, which would REALLY cut down on the piracy that goes on.

EinBebop
06-27-2004, 10:58 PM
that if the industry would release films to DVD quicker, most of the bootleg possessors wouldn't purchase them any longer, which would REALLY cut down on the piracy that goes on.I believe the average release window is about three to four months. You cut it back too much more, and you're still hurting the movie industry because everyone knows it will be on DVD tomorrow.

loyalheart
06-27-2004, 11:12 PM
In the House of Representatives, a committee approved a bill that would ban the use of spyware to track computer users without their permission.

that stood out the most because MAYBE it will help stop these popups programs and crap that are installed by spyware

Juu-kuchi
06-28-2004, 12:43 AM
I believe the average release window is about three to four months. You cut it back too much more, and you're still hurting the movie industry because everyone knows it will be on DVD tomorrow.
The age of Spaceballs has yet to come...

Nick K.
06-28-2004, 12:48 AM
I've always opposed bootlegging. I'm glad they're attempting to kill it, though i doubt it'll die down.

Roman Legion
06-28-2004, 01:18 AM
Congress advanced or passed several bills this week that would increase penalties for infringing copyright, and outlaw devices and software that could be used to illegally copy and distribute content . . . Even existing devices and software -- like iPods and FTP servers -- could run afoul of the law.

Heck, ban "file-sharing" broadly enough, and the internet itself might as well be illegal. I'm sure the MPAA and RIAA would love to see that. Between this and outsourcing, I should kiss any possible future as a software developer good-bye. Heh. :sweat:


"allow creative artists to sue corporations that profit by encouraging children, teenagers and others to commit illegal or criminal acts of copyright infringement..."

Riiight... that surely won't stifle technological progress.


"Today, high-quality, yet illegal, copies of copyrighted material can be and are distributed easily -- and almost instantly -- via e-mail, peer-to-peer networks and other means to millions of users on a regular basis,"

In other words, we can look forward to a future attack on e-mail. :p Stupid, yes, but I wouldn't put it past them. Attacks on everything from instant messaging to IRC and newsgroups might just follow.

...and "easily . . . and almost instantly"? Yeah, we all wish we had it so good. Once high speed internet is banned, we'll keep on wishing for a looong time.


I've always opposed bootlegging. I'm glad they're attempting to kill it, though i doubt it'll die down.

Trying to suppress bootlegging is one thing... but these people are insane. They have no shortage of money and power, either. Even if the current bills fail, more will follow. With several inane bills of a similar nature having already passed, the continued onslaught should be worrying a lot more people.

Romey
--I love a good short rant. :D

Westlander
06-29-2004, 08:52 PM
I've always opposed bootlegging. I'm glad they're attempting to kill it, though i doubt it'll die down.You're getting less fun for more money. In the old days, an album was 60 mins, if not 74 mins long. Now it's rarely longer than 45 mins. Artists get only 40% from every CD that is sold. Some of them (mainly non-mainstream ones) just give out free MP3s of their songs, like Polish bands Dezerter and Afrokolektyw.
The 60% is for feeding fat, greedy pigs whose only goal is to gain more money and grow fatter. The art is dead. What we get now is a PRODUCT. It's not the artists who create their style, but morons from marketing, who force the "artists" to make more of the same. Look at Limp Bizkit's first two albums. It's "canned rebellion" for the Generation Nothing. For posers who want to rebel, because it's trendy. Fashion and music go together now - Avril Lavigne's "punk tie" is a good example.

Heck, ban "file-sharing" broadly enough, and the internet itself might as well be illegal. Soon THINKING will be illegal. Everything is slowly going to turn people into docile zombies, lobotomized by lethal doses of stupid TV shows. Dystopic? It's easier to control a complete moron that believes in every word of the Great Father/Big Brother/Il Duce/The Leader.

In other words, we can look forward to a future attack on e-mail. :p Stupid, yes, but I wouldn't put it past them. Attacks on everything from instant messaging to IRC and newsgroups might just follow.Guess what, you're right. MSN already has an artificially slowed file transfer.

shogunthethird
06-29-2004, 11:00 PM
You're getting less fun for more money. In the old days, an album was 60 mins, if not 74 mins long. Now it's rarely longer than 45 mins. Artists get only 40% from every CD that is sold. Some of them (mainly non-mainstream ones) just give out free MP3s of their songs, like Polish bands Dezerter and Afrokolektyw.
The 60% is for feeding fat, greedy pigs whose only goal is to gain more money and grow fatter. The art is dead. What we get now is a PRODUCT. It's not the artists who create their style, but morons from marketing, who force the "artists" to make more of the same. Look at Limp Bizkit's first two albums. It's "canned rebellion" for the Generation Nothing. For posers who want to rebel, because it's trendy. Fashion and music go together now - Avril Lavigne's "punk tie" is a good example.
Soon THINKING will be illegal. Everything is slowly going to turn people into docile zombies, lobotomized by lethal doses of stupid TV shows. Dystopic? It's easier to control a complete moron that believes in every word of the Great Father/Big Brother/Il Duce/The Leader.
Guess what, you're right. MSN already has an artificially slowed file transfer.

wow, I'd almost dismiss this as the rantings of a lunatic if I wasn't already seeing this kind of thing happen with my own eyes, just not as fast as you say it is, it's not so much slowly but as a glacial pace too slow for anyone but a few people to notice (you know, the ones they dismiss as paranoid lunatics but like the old saying goes "just because you're paranoid doesn't mean no one's after you)

EinBebop
06-30-2004, 12:27 AM
Soon THINKING will be illegal. Hate crimes anyone? :eek:

Westlander
06-30-2004, 10:18 AM
wow, I'd almost dismiss this as the rantings of a lunatic if I wasn't already seeing this kind of thing happen with my own eyes, just not as fast as you say it is, it's not so much slowly but as a glacial pace too slow for anyone but a few people to noticeI saw it too, but I have a bad tendency to exaggerate the facts :p. But most people think that "it's not their business"...And this is wrong.
The only thing that bothers me with bootlegging is the bootleggers' "inventiveness": they translate games to Polish with a really crap effect. One of the quotes I remember:
"If you are having too much resources, you can sell them for gold, and then, for that gold, you can buy the things you are needing." (Translated back to English... But instead of Polish word "zasoby" these idiots left "resoursy" - WTF? Neither Polish nor English...)

PowerZord
06-30-2004, 07:29 PM
There's Millions of people that use Kazaa and all that, Half of the world will be empty is this finishes his pass