What? How do you come to that conclusion? Bandai is involved in the project which means they are the ones that CN went to, to get IGPX done. If this were Turner's deal, you would see Itochu creditted, and there would be no middleman period. I don't know why CN went to Bandai (to get it greenlighted faster?) but they did and we'll all be left scratching our heads over it.
How many times do I have to say this? Let's go over the initial press:
Go ahead and try to piece together some logical explanation that Turner may have already gotten the 3 billion yen together, successfully solicited the
animation studios, and gotten merchandising deals, 5 months ahead of schedule, in order to get IGPX created, and only 2 weeks after Itochu and Turner announced their joint project. But such an explanation will only make sense to you. I would need considerable evidence on your behalf before I consider that IGPX could be part of this Time Warner deal. It requires too much of a leap of logic for me to swallow.
Three programs will be produced for 2006. But we won't know what they are until THEY EXIST. Turner still needs to set up deals for said series. They still have to put up the MONEY to do so. We aren't even in the conceptual phase yet. I would not even be sure that Sam Register would be in charge of creating said projects. It would probably fall into the hands of Turner VPs.
Bookmarks